You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antimetastatic Effects of Phyllanthus on Human Lung (A549) and Breast (MCF-7) Cancer Cell Lines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0020994 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sau Har Lee, Indu Bala Jaganath, Seok Mui Wang, Shamala Devi Sekaran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lebanon | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 23% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,154,259
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#133,205
of 224,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,772
of 117,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,162
of 1,903 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,903 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.