↓ Skip to main content

Self-reported adherence supports patient preference for the single tablet regimen (STR) in the current cART era

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-reported adherence supports patient preference for the single tablet regimen (STR) in the current cART era
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, June 2012
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s31385
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gaetana Sterrantino, Santoro, Bartolozzi, Trotta, Zaccarelli

Abstract

To analyze self-reported adherence to antiretroviral regimens containing ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), raltegravir, and maraviroc.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 24%
Student > Master 7 19%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Lecturer 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 5 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2012.
All research outputs
#14,147,730
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#796
of 1,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,589
of 165,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.