↓ Skip to main content

Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001298.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gaity Ahmad, Matthew Thompson, Kyungmin Kim, Priya Agarwal, Fiona L Mackie, Sofia Dias, Mostafa Metwally, Andrew Watson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 12 27%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Unspecified 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 8 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,367,359
of 16,791,453 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,028
of 11,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,917
of 300,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,791,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.