You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of molecular weight of polyethyleneimine on loading of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides onto flake-shell silica nanoparticles for enhanced TLR9-mediated induction of interferon-α
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s32592 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuvaraj Manoharan, Qingmin Ji, Tomohiko Yamazaki, Shanmugavel Chinnathambi, Song Chen, Singaravelu Ganesan, Jonathan P Hill, Katsuhiko Ariga, Nobutaka Hanagata |
Abstract |
Class B CpG oligodeoxynucleotides primarily interact with Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) in B cells and enhance the immune system through induction of various interleukins including interleukin-6 in these immune cells. Although free class B CpG oligodeoxynucleotides do not induce interferon (IFN)-α production, CpG oligodeoxynucleotide molecules have been reported to induce IFN-α when loaded onto nanoparticles. Here, we investigated the in vitro induction of IFN-α by a nanocarrier delivery system for class B CpG oligodeoxynucleotide molecules. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 7% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 24 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 32% |
Researcher | 6 | 21% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Materials Science | 6 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 21% |
Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,113
of 4,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,620
of 177,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#75
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.