↓ Skip to main content

Spectral domain OCT versus time domain OCT in the evaluation of macular features related to wet age-related macular degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spectral domain OCT versus time domain OCT in the evaluation of macular features related to wet age-related macular degeneration
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2012
DOI 10.2147/opth.s27656
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Milani, Pierro, Zampedri, Gagliardi, Alfredo Pece

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the agreement between spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) and time domain stratus OCT (TD OCT) in evaluating macular morphology alterations in wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Computer Science 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2012.
All research outputs
#18,310,549
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2,524
of 3,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,036
of 247,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#16
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.