↓ Skip to main content

Política de promoção da saúde e planejamento urbano: articulações para o desenvolvimento da cidade saudável

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Política de promoção da saúde e planejamento urbano: articulações para o desenvolvimento da cidade saudável
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2016
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232015216.10812016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Maria Girotti Sperandio, Lauro Luiz Francisco Filho, Thiago Pedrosa Mattos

Abstract

The National Health Promotion Policy (PNPS) defines strategies for devising inter-sectoral public policies that ensure the development of healthy cities. Urban planning constitutes a tool to improve the quality of life and enhance health promotion. Using the studies and cooperation actions conducted by the Urban Research Laboratory (LABINUR/FEC-Unicamp) as a reference, this article describes relevant aspects of the PNPS that have an interface with urban planning policies in Brazil. An increase in interdisciplinary and inter-sectoral measures related to the new PNPS after the passing of Ordinance 2.446/14 was identified, which include: mobility and accessibility; safe development (sanitation, housing and transport); healthy eating with social inclusion and reduction of poverty (community vegetable gardens); corporal activities and physical exercise and the enhancement of urban spaces. The conclusion drawn is that social participation, inter-sectoral activities and the role of the university are important aspects for the promotion of healthy cities.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 31%
Student > Bachelor 16 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Researcher 3 4%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Arts and Humanities 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 24 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2016.
All research outputs
#10,030,588
of 12,536,156 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#422
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,018
of 264,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,536,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.