↓ Skip to main content

Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002251.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheryl Chooi, Julia J Cox, Richard S Lumb, Philippa Middleton, Mark Chemali, Richard S Emmett, Scott W Simmons, Allan M Cyna

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 128 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Postgraduate 14 11%
Other 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 32 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#5,137,262
of 16,189,386 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,865
of 11,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,778
of 300,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,189,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.