You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Seasonal patterns of soil carbon dioxide efflux from a wet-dry tropical savanna of northern Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Australian Journal of Botany, February 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1071/bt01049 |
| Authors |
Xiaoyong Chen, Derek Eamus, Lindsay B. Hutley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 31% |
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 48% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 14% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2007.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Botany
#157
of 636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,290
of 130,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Botany
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.