| Title |
Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Infection, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.051 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tristan W Clark, Nathan J Brendish, Stephen Poole, Vasanth V Naidu, Christopher Mansbridge, Nicholas Norton, Helen Wheeler, Laura Presland, Sean Ewings |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 46 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2021.
All research outputs
#488,919
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infection
#124
of 2,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,456
of 433,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infection
#12
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.