| Title |
Quantifying professionalism in peer review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-020-00096-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Travis G. Gerwing, Alyssa M. Allen Gerwing, Stephanie Avery-Gomm, Chi-Yeung Choi, Jeff C. Clements, Joshua A. Rash |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 313 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 53 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 29 | 9% |
| Canada | 18 | 6% |
| Australia | 11 | 4% |
| Germany | 9 | 3% |
| France | 8 | 3% |
| India | 8 | 3% |
| Ireland | 6 | 2% |
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 121 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 168 | 54% |
| Scientists | 123 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 25% |
| Unknown | 26 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 219. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2023.
All research outputs
#179,737
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#4
of 133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,764
of 428,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them