↓ Skip to main content

Correction: CD95 maintains stem cell-like and non-classical EMT programs in primary human glioblastoma cells

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Death & Disease, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction: CD95 maintains stem cell-like and non-classical EMT programs in primary human glioblastoma cells
Published in
Cell Death & Disease, July 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41419-020-2698-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moritz Drachsler, Susanne Kleber, Alvaro Mateos, Katrin Volk, Nadine Mohr, Si Chen, Branko Cirovic, Jochen Tüttenberg, Christian Gieffers, Jaromir Sykora, Christian Wirtz, Wolf Mueller, Michael Synowitz, Ana Martin-Villalba

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,685,101
of 16,649,395 outputs
Outputs from Cell Death & Disease
#3,919
of 4,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,356
of 299,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Death & Disease
#187
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,649,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.