You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004345.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edmund Bailey, Wafa Kashbour, Neha Shah, Helen V Worthington, Tara F Renton, Paul Coulthard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 17% |
| Ireland | 2 | 11% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Greece | 1 | 6% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 362 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 50 | 14% |
| Unknown | 183 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | <1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Unknown | 189 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,554,806
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,266
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,762
of 429,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.