| Title |
Social distancing responses to COVID-19 emergency declarations strongly differentiated by income
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2009412117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joakim A. Weill, Matthieu Stigler, Olivier Deschenes, Michael R. Springborn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,450 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 468 | 32% |
| United States | 188 | 13% |
| Canada | 30 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 26 | 2% |
| Spain | 15 | 1% |
| Australia | 8 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Argentina | 5 | <1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| Other | 80 | 6% |
| Unknown | 620 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1276 | 88% |
| Scientists | 116 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 27 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 386 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 50 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 16% |
| Unknown | 127 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 17 | 4% |
| Engineering | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 103 | 27% |
| Unknown | 151 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1057. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#15,056
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#486
of 103,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#696
of 428,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#22
of 1,130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.