↓ Skip to main content

Patellar taping for patellofemoral pain syndrome in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patellar taping for patellofemoral pain syndrome in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006717.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J Callaghan, James Selfe

Abstract

Patellofemoral pain syndrome refers to the clinical presentation of knee pain related to changes in the patellofemoral joint. Patellofemoral pain syndrome usually has a gradual onset of pain with none of the features associated with other knee diseases or trauma. It is often treated by physiotherapists, who use a variety of techniques including patellar taping. This involves the application of adhesive sports medical tape applied directly to the skin over the patella on the front of the knee. Patients often report an instantaneous improvement in pain and function after the tape is applied, but its longer term effects are uncertain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 330 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 126 37%
Student > Master 51 15%
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Student > Postgraduate 27 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 7%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 22 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 182 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 68 20%
Sports and Recreations 21 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 5%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Other 19 6%
Unknown 29 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,411,419
of 13,044,081 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,032
of 10,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,359
of 120,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,044,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.