You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physiological Capabilities of Cryoconite Hole Microorganisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01783 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ewa A. Poniecka, Elizabeth A. Bagshaw, Henrik Sass, Amelia Segar, Gordon Webster, Christopher Williamson, Alexandre M. Anesio, Martyn Tranter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 30% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 6 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,528,497
of 24,983,099 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#1,986
of 28,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,461
of 404,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#89
of 934 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,983,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 934 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.