You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are There Neurophenotypes for Asthma? Functional Brain Imaging of the Interaction between Emotion and Inflammation in Asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0040921 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa A. Rosenkranz, William W. Busse, John F. Sheridan, Gina M. Crisafi, Richard J. Davidson |
| Abstract |
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease noteworthy for its vulnerability to stress and emotion-induced symptom intensification. The fact that psychological stress and mood and anxiety disorders appear to increase expression of asthma symptoms suggests that neural signaling between the brain and lung at least partially modulates the inflammatory response and lung function. However, the precise nature of the neural pathways implicated in modulating asthma symptoms is unknown. Moreover, the extent to which variations in neural signaling predict different phenotypes of disease expression has not been studied. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 25% |
| Egypt | 2 | 13% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,982,916
of 25,282,542 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#36,632
of 219,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,722
of 170,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#594
of 4,098 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,282,542 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,098 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.