↓ Skip to main content

Corticosteroid resistance in sepsis is influenced by microRNA-124–induced downregulation of glucocorticoid receptor-&agr;*

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corticosteroid resistance in sepsis is influenced by microRNA-124–induced downregulation of glucocorticoid receptor-&agr;*
Published in
Critical Care Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.1097/ccm.0b013e31825b8ebc
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carola Ledderose, Patrick Möhnle, Elisabeth Limbeck, Stefanie Schütz, Florian Weis, Jessica Rink, Josef Briegel, Simone Kreth

Abstract

Acquired glucocorticoid resistance frequently complicates the therapy of sepsis. It leads to an exaggerated proinflammatory response and has been related to altered expression profiles of glucocorticoid receptor isoforms glucocorticoid receptor-α (mediating anti-inflammatory effects) and glucocorticoid receptor-β (acting as a dominant negative inhibitor). We investigated the impact of glucocorticoid receptor isoforms on glucocorticoid effects in human T-cells. We hypothesized that 1) changes of the ratio of glucocorticoid receptor isoforms impact glucocorticoid resistance and 2) glucocorticoid receptor-α expression is controlled by microRNA-mediated gene silencing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Professor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 13%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2012.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#4,757
of 9,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,542
of 190,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#33
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.