You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving health information systems during an emergency: lessons and recommendations from an Ebola treatment centre in Sierra Leone
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-019-0817-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shefali Oza, Kevin Wing, Alieu Amara Sesay, Sabah Boufkhed, Catherine Houlihan, Lahai Vandi, Sahr Charles Sebba, Catherine R. McGowan, Rachael Cummings, Francesco Checchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,880,171
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#519
of 1,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,469
of 349,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,986 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.