You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
SIRM-SIAAIC consensus, an Italian document on management of patients at risk of hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical and Molecular Allergy, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12948-020-00128-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria Teresa Costantino, Laura Romanini, Francesco Gaeta, Fulvio Stacul, Rocco Luigi Valluzzi, Matteo Passamonti, Patrizia Bonadonna, Giovanni Cerri, Stefano Pucci, Paolo Ricci, Eleonora Savi, Michele Galluzzo, Marina Mauro, Emanuele Grassedonio, Mona Rita Yacoub, Alfonso Reginelli, Sergio Testi, Erminia Ridolo, Eustacchio Nettis, Elisabetta Di Leo, Oliviero Rossi, Paolo Montuschi, Cristoforo Incorvaia, Antonino Romano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Romania | 6 | 33% |
Thailand | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
Jordan | 1 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Italy | 1 | 6% |
Argentina | 1 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
Scientists | 4 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Librarian | 1 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,048,010
of 25,340,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Molecular Allergy
#19
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,865
of 405,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Molecular Allergy
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,340,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them