| Title |
Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a large cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00706-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiao Liu, Sheng Zhang, Zhixiong Wu, You Shang, Xuan Dong, Guang Li, Lidi Zhang, Yizhu Chen, Xiaofei Ye, Hangxiang Du, Yongan Liu, Tao Wang, SiSi Huang, Limin Chen, Zhenliang Wen, Jieming Qu, Dechang Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 9 | 33% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Mali | 1 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Honduras | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 267 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 12% |
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 19% |
| Unknown | 90 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 99 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#940,618
of 25,243,120 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#105
of 1,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,436
of 405,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,243,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.