| Title |
Convalescent plasma to treat critically ill patients with COVID-19: framing the need for randomised clinical trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03163-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manu Shankar-Hari, Lise Estcourt, Heli Harvala, David Roberts, David K. Menon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Librarian | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#16,057,393
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,212
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,286
of 429,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#165
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.