↓ Skip to main content

Capability of three-dimensional speckle tracking radial strain for identification of patients with cardiac sarcoidosis

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Capability of three-dimensional speckle tracking radial strain for identification of patients with cardiac sarcoidosis
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10554-012-0104-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takayuki Tsuji, Hidekazu Tanaka, Kensuke Matsumoto, Tatsuya Miyoshi, Mana Hiraishi, Akihiro Kaneko, Keiko Ryo, Yuko Fukuda, Kazuhiro Tatsumi, Tetsuari Onishi, Hiroya Kawai, Ken-ich Hirata

Abstract

Since cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) leads to substantial morbidity and sudden death, early diagnosis and appropriate management are crucial for patients with CS. Echocardiography used to be considered a useful diagnostic tool for patients with CS, but CS may clinically present as dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Our objective was to investigate whether a novel three-dimensional (3-D) speckle-tracking strain can identify patients with CS more accurately. We studied 23 CS patients with an ejection fraction (EF) of 46 ± 10 %, and 16 EF-matched patients with DCM (EF 45 ± 11 %). Global radial (GRS), circumferential (GCS) and longitudinal (GLS) strain was assessed using 3-D speckle-tracking system. GRS of patients with CS was significantly lower than that of patients with DCM (18.5 ± 8.4 vs. 28.5 ± 8.3 %, p < 0.01), but GCS and GLS in patients with CS and DCM were similar. GRS ≦ 21.1 could differentiate CS from DCM with a sensitivity of 70 %, specificity of 88 % and area under the curve of 0.79. An additional noteworthy findings was that, patients with CS showed more negative radial strain curves than did those with DCM (1.7 ± 2.3 vs. 0.1 ± 0.5, p < 0.01). In conclusion, 3-D speckle-tracking radial strain shows good potential to distinguish CS from DCM. Our observations can thus be expected to have clinical implications for management of CS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 67%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2012.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,460
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,509
of 179,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.