↓ Skip to main content

Carnitine for fatigue in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Carnitine for fatigue in multiple sclerosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007280.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron M Tejani, Michael Wasdell, Rae Spiwak, Greg Rowell, Shabita Nathwani

Abstract

Fatigue is reported to occur in up to 92% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and has been described as the most debilitating of all MS symptoms by 28% to 40% of MS patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 70%
Unspecified 5 50%
Other 3 30%
Student > Master 2 20%
Librarian 2 20%
Other 8 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 100%
Unspecified 8 80%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 30%
Psychology 2 20%
Neuroscience 2 20%
Other 2 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,081,110
of 13,216,344 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,335
of 10,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,979
of 121,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,216,344 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.