You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Robotic versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Cost Analysis from A Single Institute in Korea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-012-1728-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Se‐Jin Baek, Seon‐Hahn Kim, Jae‐Sung Cho, Jae‐Won Shin, Jin Kim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 60% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,363,008
of 24,160,198 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#307
of 4,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,931
of 167,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,160,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.