↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines os the Brazilian Society of Cardiology on Telemedicine in Cardiology - 2019

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidelines os the Brazilian Society of Cardiology on Telemedicine in Cardiology - 2019
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, January 2019
DOI 10.5935/abc.20190205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcelo Antônio Cartaxo Queiroga Lopes, Glaucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira, Antônio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, Fausto Pinto, Helena Cramer Veiga Rey, Andre´a Arau´jo Branda~o, Leandro Ioschpe Zimerman, Ludhmila Abraha~o Hajjar, Carlos Eduardo Rochitte, Fernando Bacal, Carisi Anne Polanczyk, Cidio Halperin, Edson Correia Araújo, Evandro Tinoco Mesquita, José Airton Arruda, Luis Eduardo Paim Rohde, Max Grinberg, Miguel Moretti, Paulo Ricardo Avancini Caramori, Roberto Vieira Botelho, Alexandre Fonseca Santos, Alexandre Siciliano Colafranceschi, Ana Paula Beck da Silva Etges, Bárbara Campos Abreu Marino, Bruna Zanotto, Bruno Ramos Nascimento, Cesar Medeiros, Daniel Vitor de Vasconcelos Santos, Daniela Matos Arrowsmith Cook, Eduardo Antoniolli, Erito Marques de Souza Filho, Fábio Fernandes, Fabio Gandour, Francisco Fernandez, Germano Emilio Conceição Souza, Guilherme de Souza Weigert, Iran Castro, Jamil Ribeiro Cade, José Albuquerque de Figueiredo Neto, Juliano de Lara Fernandes, Marcelo Souza Hadlich, Marco Antonio Praça Oliveira, Maria Beatriz Alkmim, Maria Cristina da Paixão, Maurício Lopes Prudente, Miguel Aguiar, Milena Soriano Marcolino, Monica Amorim de Oliveira, Osvaldo Simonelli, Pedro A. Lemos, Priscila Raupp da Rosa, Renato Minelli Figueira, Roberto Caldeira Cury, Rodrigo Coelho Almeida, Sandra Regina Franco Lima, Silvio Henrique Barberato, Thiago Inocêncio Constancio, Wladimir Fernandes de Rezende

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 18%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Other 9 8%
Professor 7 6%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Unspecified 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 35 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,503,741
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#183
of 1,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,628
of 436,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#10
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,084 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.