↓ Skip to main content

The Eyes Have It: Sex and Sexual Orientation Differences in Pupil Dilation Patterns

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
122 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Eyes Have It: Sex and Sexual Orientation Differences in Pupil Dilation Patterns
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0040256
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerulf Rieger, Ritch C. Savin-Williams

Abstract

Recent research suggests profound sex and sexual orientation differences in sexual response. These results, however, are based on measures of genital arousal, which have potential limitations such as volunteer bias and differential measures for the sexes. The present study introduces a measure less affected by these limitations. We assessed the pupil dilation of 325 men and women of various sexual orientations to male and female erotic stimuli. Results supported hypotheses. In general, self-reported sexual orientation corresponded with pupil dilation to men and women. Among men, substantial dilation to both sexes was most common in bisexual-identified men. In contrast, among women, substantial dilation to both sexes was most common in heterosexual-identified women. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed. Because the measure of pupil dilation is less invasive than previous measures of sexual response, it allows for studying diverse age and cultural populations, usually not included in sexuality research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Canada 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 207 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 21%
Student > Master 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 34 15%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 55 24%
Unknown 22 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 106 47%
Social Sciences 20 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Neuroscience 10 4%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 27 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 284. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#127,791
of 25,911,277 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,977
of 226,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#544
of 180,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#18
of 4,044 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,911,277 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,044 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.