↓ Skip to main content

A Phase I Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study of a Multigenic HIV-1 Adenovirus Subtype 35 Vector Vaccine in Healthy Uninfected Adults

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Phase I Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study of a Multigenic HIV-1 Adenovirus Subtype 35 Vector Vaccine in Healthy Uninfected Adults
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041936
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael C. Keefer, Jill Gilmour, Peter Hayes, Dilbinder Gill, Jakub Kopycinski, Hannah Cheeseman, Michelle Cashin-Cox, Marloes Naarding, Lorna Clark, Natalia Fernandez, Catherine A. Bunce, Christine M. Hay, Sabrina Welsh, Wendy Komaroff, Lottie Hachaambwa, Tony Tarragona-Fiol, Eddy Sayeed, Devika Zachariah, James Ackland, Kelley Loughran, Burc Barin, Emmanuel Cormier, Josephine H. Cox, Patricia Fast, Jean-Louis Excler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Other 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,170,530
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#132,790
of 220,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,103
of 179,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,170
of 4,068 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,068 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.