↓ Skip to main content

Vessel Noise Affects Beaked Whale Behavior: Results of a Dedicated Acoustic Response Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vessel Noise Affects Beaked Whale Behavior: Results of a Dedicated Acoustic Response Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0042535
Pubmed ID
Authors

Enrico Pirotta, Rachael Milor, Nicola Quick, David Moretti, Nancy Di Marzio, Peter Tyack, Ian Boyd, Gordon Hastie

Abstract

Some beaked whale species are susceptible to the detrimental effects of anthropogenic noise. Most studies have concentrated on the effects of military sonar, but other forms of acoustic disturbance (e.g. shipping noise) may disrupt behavior. An experiment involving the exposure of target whale groups to intense vessel-generated noise tested how these exposures influenced the foraging behavior of Blainville's beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris) in the Tongue of the Ocean (Bahamas). A military array of bottom-mounted hydrophones was used to measure the response based upon changes in the spatial and temporal pattern of vocalizations. The archived acoustic data were used to compute metrics of the echolocation-based foraging behavior for 16 targeted groups, 10 groups further away on the range, and 26 non-exposed groups. The duration of foraging bouts was not significantly affected by the exposure. Changes in the hydrophone over which the group was most frequently detected occurred as the animals moved around within a foraging bout, and their number was significantly less the closer the whales were to the sound source. Non-exposed groups also had significantly more changes in the primary hydrophone than exposed groups irrespective of distance. Our results suggested that broadband ship noise caused a significant change in beaked whale behavior up to at least 5.2 kilometers away from the vessel. The observed change could potentially correspond to a restriction in the movement of groups, a period of more directional travel, a reduction in the number of individuals clicking within the group, or a response to changes in prey movement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 259 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 77 28%
Student > Bachelor 42 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 14%
Student > Master 29 10%
Other 24 9%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 39 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 143 51%
Environmental Science 56 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 5%
Engineering 5 2%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 8 3%
Unknown 49 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,374,498
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30,249
of 194,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,921
of 164,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#516
of 4,050 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,050 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.