You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social Network Analysis in Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Scoping Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0041911 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Duncan Chambers, Paul Wilson, Carl Thompson, Melissa Harden |
| Abstract |
Social network analysis (SNA) has been widely used across a range of disciplines but is most commonly applied to help improve the effectiveness and efficiency of decision making processes in commercial organisations. We are utilising SNA to inform the development and implementation of tailored behaviour-change interventions to improve the uptake of evidence into practice in the English National Health Service. To inform this work, we conducted a systematic scoping review to identify and evaluate the use of SNA as part of an intervention to support the implementation of change in healthcare settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 25% |
| United States | 6 | 25% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 13% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 429 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 84 | 19% |
| Researcher | 59 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 59 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 101 | 23% |
| Unknown | 90 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 79 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 99 | 22% |
| Unknown | 103 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2014.
All research outputs
#1,916,493
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#24,341
of 202,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,155
of 165,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#392
of 4,053 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,053 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.