↓ Skip to main content

Service provision and barriers to care for homeless people with mental health problems across 14 European capital cities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Service provision and barriers to care for homeless people with mental health problems across 14 European capital cities
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Réamonn Canavan, Margaret M Barry, Aleksandra Matanov, Henrique Barros, Edina Gabor, Tim Greacen, Petra Holcnerová, Ulrike Kluge, Pablo Nicaise, Jacek Moskalewicz, José Manuel Díaz-Olalla, Christa Straßmayr, Aart H Schene, Joaquim J F Soares, Andrea Gaddini, Stefan Priebe

Abstract

Mental health problems are disproportionately higher amongst homeless people. Many barriers exist for homeless people with mental health problems in accessing treatment yet little research has been done on service provision and quality of care for this group. The aim of this paper is to assess current service provision and identify barriers to care for homeless people with mental health problems in 14 European capital cities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 171 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 17%
Social Sciences 28 16%
Psychology 15 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 46 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,581,725
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,629
of 8,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,984
of 181,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#31
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.