↓ Skip to main content

Demonstration of the Cascadia G‐FAST Geodetic Earthquake Early Warning System for the Nisqually, Washington, Earthquake

Overview of attention for article published in Seismological Research Letters, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Demonstration of the Cascadia G‐FAST Geodetic Earthquake Early Warning System for the Nisqually, Washington, Earthquake
Published in
Seismological Research Letters, June 2016
DOI 10.1785/0220150255
Authors

Brendan W. Crowell, David A. Schmidt, Paul Bodin, John E. Vidale, Joan Gomberg, J. Renate Hartog, Victor C. Kress, Timothy I. Melbourne, Marcelo Santillan, Sarah E. Minson, Dylan G. Jamison

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 65%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2016.
All research outputs
#3,707,347
of 12,700,682 outputs
Outputs from Seismological Research Letters
#249
of 485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,939
of 263,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seismological Research Letters
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,700,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.