You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Awareness, perception and factors affecting utilization of cervical cancer screening services among women in Ibadan, Nigeria: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-4755-9-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chizoma Millicent Ndikom, Bola Abosede Ofi |
| Abstract |
Over the years awareness and uptake of cervical cancer screening services has remained poor in developing countries. Problems associated with cervical cancer incidence include late reporting, ignorance and cultural issues relating to cervical cancer screening. This study sought to explore the awareness, perception and utilization of cervical cancer screening among women in Ibadan as well as factors that influence utilization. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 532 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 4 | <1% |
| Ghana | 3 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 524 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 121 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 58 | 11% |
| Researcher | 38 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 81 | 15% |
| Unknown | 131 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 184 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 107 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 38 | 7% |
| Unknown | 157 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2012.
All research outputs
#14,730,916
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#1,074
of 1,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,505
of 166,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.