↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Pregabalin on Central Sensitization in Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis in a Randomized, Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Pregabalin on Central Sensitization in Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis in a Randomized, Controlled Trial
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0042096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan A. W. Bouwense, Søren S. Olesen, Asbjørn M. Drewes, Jan-Werner Poley, Harry van Goor, Oliver H. G. Wilder-Smith

Abstract

Intense abdominal pain is the dominant feature of chronic pancreatitis. During the disease changes in central pain processing, e.g. central sensitization manifest as spreading hyperalgesia, can result from ongoing nociceptive input. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of pregabalin on pain processing in chronic pancreatitis as assessed by quantitative sensory testing (QST).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Other 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 32 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,006,387
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#71,538
of 193,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,582
of 166,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,202
of 4,129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.