↓ Skip to main content

Negative attributions towards people with substance use disorders in South Africa: Variation across substances and by gender

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negative attributions towards people with substance use disorders in South Africa: Variation across substances and by gender
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-12-101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine Sorsdahl, Dan J Stein, Bronwyn Myers

Abstract

Little research has examined attitudes towards people who use substances in low and middle income countries (LMIC). Therefore, the present study examined the attributions made by the general South African population about people who use substances and whether these attributions differ by the type of substance being used, the gender of the person using the substance, or the characteristics of the person making the attribution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 20%
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 32 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 18%
Social Sciences 19 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 37 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2012.
All research outputs
#13,242,166
of 23,342,664 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,776
of 4,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,225
of 167,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#50
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,664 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.