↓ Skip to main content

Hiroshima e Nagazaki: razões para experimentar a nova arma

Overview of attention for article published in Scientiae Studia, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hiroshima e Nagazaki: razões para experimentar a nova arma
Published in
Scientiae Studia, December 2005
DOI 10.1590/s1678-31662005000400011
Authors

Ronaldo Rogério de Freitas Mourão

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Professor 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Philosophy 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 5 26%
Unknown 6 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,126,295
of 21,895,296 outputs
Outputs from Scientiae Studia
#15
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,931
of 314,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientiae Studia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,895,296 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them