↓ Skip to main content

Creative Methodologies for a Mobile Criminology: Walking as Critical Pedagogy

Overview of attention for article published in Sociological Research Online, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 439)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Creative Methodologies for a Mobile Criminology: Walking as Critical Pedagogy
Published in
Sociological Research Online, August 2020
DOI 10.1177/1360780420922250
Authors

Maggie O’Neill, Ruth Penfold-Mounce, David Honeywell, Matt Coward-Gibbs, Harriet Crowder, Ivan Hill

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2020.
All research outputs
#818,698
of 15,872,858 outputs
Outputs from Sociological Research Online
#34
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,350
of 278,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociological Research Online
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,872,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them