↓ Skip to main content

Physiologic variations of serum tumor markers in gynecological malignancies during pregnancy: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiologic variations of serum tumor markers in gynecological malignancies during pregnancy: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medicine, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-10-86
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sileny N Han, Anouk Lotgerink, Mina Mhallem Gziri, Kristel Van Calsteren, Myriam Hanssens, Frédéric Amant

Abstract

Recent insights provide support for the treatment of cancer during pregnancy, a coincidence that poses both mother and fetus at risk. Our aim was to critically review studies on the physiologic variations during pregnancy, the most common tumor markers used in diagnosis and follow-up of gynecological cancers.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Other 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 58%
Unspecified 5 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Other 5 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2013.
All research outputs
#977,190
of 12,517,134 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#823
of 2,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,517
of 121,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,517,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.