↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the Impact of Copper and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on Soil: A Field Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the Impact of Copper and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles on Soil: A Field Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0042663
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Collins, Todd Luxton, Niraj Kumar, Shreya Shah, Virginia K. Walker, Vishal Shah

Abstract

It is not known if the annual production of tonnes of industrial nanoparticles (NPs) has the potential to impact terrestrial microbial communities, which are so necessary for ecosystem functioning. Here, we have examined the consequences of adding zero valent copper and zinc oxide NPs to soil in pots that were then maintained under field conditions. The fate of these NPs, as well as changes in the microbial communities, was monitored over 162 days. Both NP types traveled through the soil matrix, albeit at differential rates, with Cu NPs retained in the soil matrix at a higher rate compared to ZnO NPs. Leaching of Cu and Zn ions from the parent NPs was also observed as a function of time. Analysis of microbial communities using culture-dependent and independent methods clearly indicated that Cu and ZnO NPs altered the microbial community structure. In particular, two orders of organisms found in rhizosphere, Flavobacteriales and Sphingomonadales, appeared to be particularly susceptible to the presence of NPs. Together, the migration of NPs through soil matrix and the ability of these potential pollutants to influence the composition of microbial community in this field study, cannot help but raise some environmental concerns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 145 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 21%
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 31 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 25%
Environmental Science 27 17%
Chemistry 16 10%
Engineering 10 6%
Materials Science 6 4%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 41 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2012.
All research outputs
#2,919,971
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#38,791
of 193,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,183
of 166,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#657
of 4,137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.