The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The (in)compatibility of identities: Understanding gender differences in work–life conflict through the fit with leaders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Social Psychology, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/bjso.12411 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thekla Morgenroth, Michelle K. Ryan, Floor Rink, Christopher Begeny |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 64% |
| Scientists | 8 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 64 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Design | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 63 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,985,444
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Social Psychology
#235
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,167
of 430,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Social Psychology
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.