↓ Skip to main content

Mapping Information Flow in Sensorimotor Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
252 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
367 Mendeley
citeulike
12 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mapping Information Flow in Sensorimotor Networks
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2006
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max Lungarella, Olaf Sporns

Abstract

Biological organisms continuously select and sample information used by their neural structures for perception and action, and for creating coherent cognitive states guiding their autonomous behavior. Information processing, however, is not solely an internal function of the nervous system. Here we show, instead, how sensorimotor interaction and body morphology can induce statistical regularities and information structure in sensory inputs and within the neural control architecture, and how the flow of information between sensors, neural units, and effectors is actively shaped by the interaction with the environment. We analyze sensory and motor data collected from real and simulated robots and reveal the presence of information structure and directed information flow induced by dynamically coupled sensorimotor activity, including effects of motor outputs on sensory inputs. We find that information structure and information flow in sensorimotor networks (a) is spatially and temporally specific; (b) can be affected by learning, and (c) can be affected by changes in body morphology. Our results suggest a fundamental link between physical embeddedness and information, highlighting the effects of embodied interactions on internal (neural) information processing, and illuminating the role of various system components on the generation of behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 20 5%
Germany 8 2%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Italy 5 1%
France 4 1%
Switzerland 4 1%
Spain 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 296 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 103 28%
Researcher 89 24%
Student > Master 31 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 27 7%
Professor 24 7%
Other 61 17%
Unknown 32 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 70 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 19%
Engineering 51 14%
Psychology 37 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 8%
Other 64 17%
Unknown 48 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,388,118
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,006
of 8,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,200
of 86,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#17
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.