↓ Skip to main content

Towards A Geographical Account of Shame: Foodbanks, Austerity and the Spaces of Austere Affective Governmentality

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards A Geographical Account of Shame: Foodbanks, Austerity and the Spaces of Austere Affective Governmentality
Published in
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, August 2020
DOI 10.1111/tran.12406
Authors

Samuel Strong

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,004,984
of 15,762,618 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
#74
of 685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,541
of 228,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,762,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.