| Title |
Emergency Visits for Thunderstorm-Related Respiratory Illnesses Among Older Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1672 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric Zou, Christopher Worsham, Nolan H. Miller, David Molitor, Julian Reif, Anupam B. Jena |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 28% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 2 | 3% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 65% |
| Scientists | 18 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 694. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
#27,711
of 24,318,236 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#264
of 5,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,143
of 403,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#9
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,318,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 162.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.