↓ Skip to main content

A field-based quantitative analysis of sublethal effects of air pollution on pollinators

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
44 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
257 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A field-based quantitative analysis of sublethal effects of air pollution on pollinators
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2020
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2009074117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geetha G. Thimmegowda, Susan Mullen, Katie Sottilare, Ankit Sharma, Saptashi Soham Mohanta, Axel Brockmann, Perundurai S. Dhandapany, Shannon B. Olsson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 257 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 22%
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 7 11%
Professor 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 40%
Environmental Science 8 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 8 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 572. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#20,547
of 17,094,203 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#656
of 88,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,168
of 303,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#34
of 1,126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,094,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.