You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Are scenario projections overly optimistic about future yield progress?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102120 |
Authors |
Willem-Jan van Zeist, Elke Stehfest, Jonathan C. Doelman, Hugo Valin, Katherine Calvin, Shinichiro Fujimori, Tomoko Hasegawa, Petr Havlik, Florian Humpenöder, Page Kyle, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Daniel Mason-D'Croz, Hans van Meijl, Alexander Popp, Timothy B. Sulser, Andrzej Tabeau, Willem Verhagen, Keith Wiebe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 28% |
Netherlands | 4 | 22% |
South Africa | 1 | 6% |
Panama | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
Scientists | 7 | 39% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 25 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 16 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 11% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 9% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 16% |
Unknown | 30 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,038,704
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#1,079
of 2,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,589
of 426,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.