↓ Skip to main content

Is there a need to redo many of the diagnoses of hypertension?

Overview of attention for article published in Sao Paulo Medical Journal, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is there a need to redo many of the diagnoses of hypertension?
Published in
Sao Paulo Medical Journal, January 2012
DOI 10.1590/s1516-31802012000300007
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Marcos Thalenberg, Bráulio Luna Filho, Maria Teresa Nogueira Bombig, Yoná Afonso Francisco, Rui Manuel dos Santos Póvoa

Abstract

Most hypertensive subjects undergoing treatment were diagnosed solely through measurements made in the consultation office. The objective of this study was to redo the diagnosis of treated patients after new clinical measurements and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2012.
All research outputs
#21,155,664
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Sao Paulo Medical Journal
#10
of 13 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,551
of 252,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sao Paulo Medical Journal
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.