↓ Skip to main content

聾児言語指導法の一考察 : アメリカ・日本・台湾の手話法を中心として

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of Special Education, January 1975
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
聾児言語指導法の一考察 : アメリカ・日本・台湾の手話法を中心として
Published in
The Japanese Journal of Special Education, January 1975
DOI 10.6033/tokkyou.13.49
Authors

HOKI RIN

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#13,654,968
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Special Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,818
of 20,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Special Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them