You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Therapeutic Intervention for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (CP/CPPS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0041941 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Adam P. Fagin, Eduardo Hariton, Joshua R. Niska, Michael W. Pierce, Akira Kuriyama, Julia S. Whelan, Jeffrey L. Jackson, Jordan D. Dimitrakoff |
| Abstract |
Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) has been treated with several different interventions with limited success. This meta-analysis aims to review all trials reporting on therapeutic intervention for CP/CPPS using the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Vietnam | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 146 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 39 | 25% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,458,506
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#31,288
of 197,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,413
of 165,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#536
of 4,082 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,082 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.