| Title |
Creating the Moorfields’ virtual eye casualty: video consultations to provide emergency teleophthalmology care during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Health & Care Informatics, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100179 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline LS Kilduff, Alice AP Thomas, Juliet Dugdill, Edward J Casswell, Marcin Dabrowski, Claire Lovegrove, Dawn A Sim, Gordon R Hay, Peter BM Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 22 | 43% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Algeria | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 18% |
| Scientists | 6 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 14% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 21% |
| Unknown | 53 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 60 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#831,090
of 24,777,509 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Health & Care Informatics
#12
of 311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,890
of 404,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Health & Care Informatics
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,777,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.