↓ Skip to main content

Host Modulators of H1N1 Cytopathogenicity

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Host Modulators of H1N1 Cytopathogenicity
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0039284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel E. Ward, Hyun Seok Kim, Kakajan Komurov, Saurabh Mendiratta, Pei-Ling Tsai, Mirco Schmolke, Neal Satterly, Balaji Manicassamy, Christian V. Forst, Michael G. Roth, Adolfo García-Sastre, Katarzyna M. Blazewska, Charles E. McKenna, Beatriz M. Fontoura, Michael A. White

Abstract

Influenza A virus infects 5-20% of the population annually, resulting in ~35,000 deaths and significant morbidity. Current treatments include vaccines and drugs that target viral proteins. However, both of these approaches have limitations, as vaccines require yearly development and the rapid evolution of viral proteins gives rise to drug resistance. In consequence additional intervention strategies, that target host factors required for the viral life cycle, are under investigation. Here we employed arrayed whole-genome siRNA screening strategies to identify cell-autonomous molecular components that are subverted to support H1N1 influenza A virus infection of human bronchial epithelial cells. Integration across relevant public data sets exposed druggable gene products required for epithelial cell infection or required for viral proteins to deflect host cell suicide checkpoint activation. Pharmacological inhibition of representative targets, RGGT and CHEK1, resulted in significant protection against infection of human epithelial cells by the A/WS/33 virus. In addition, chemical inhibition of RGGT partially protected against H5N1 and the 2009 H1N1 pandemic strain. The observations reported here thus contribute to an expanding body of studies directed at decoding vulnerabilities in the command and control networks specified by influenza virulence factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2012.
All research outputs
#18,312,024
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,821
of 193,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,231
of 164,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,208
of 4,082 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,082 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.