↓ Skip to main content

Shared “Core” Areas between the Pain and Other Task-Related Networks

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shared “Core” Areas between the Pain and Other Task-Related Networks
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041929
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franco Cauda, Diana M-E. Torta, Katiuscia Sacco, Elisabetta Geda, Federico D’Agata, Tommaso Costa, Sergio Duca, Giuliano Geminiani, Martina Amanzio

Abstract

The idea of a 'pain matrix' specifically devoted to the processing of nociceptive inputs has been challenged. Alternative views now propose that the activity of the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (SI, SII), the insula and cingulate cortex may be related to a basic defensive system through which significant potentially dangerous events for the body's integrity are detected. By reviewing the role of the SI, SII, the cingulate and the insular cortices in the perception of nociceptive and tactile stimuli, in attentional, emotional and reward tasks, and in interoception and memory, we found that all these task-related networks overlap in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, the anterior insula and the dorsal medial thalamus. A thorough analysis revealed that the 'pain-related' network shares important functional similarities with both somatomotor-somatosensory networks and emotional-interoceptive ones. We suggest that these shared areas constitute the central part of an adaptive control system involved in the processing and integration of salient information coming both from external and internal sources. These areas are activated in almost all fMRI tasks and have been indicated to play a pivotal role in switching between externally directed and internally directed brain networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 4%
Italy 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 105 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 20%
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 13%
Neuroscience 12 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 25 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,623,716
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#85,493
of 207,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,091
of 169,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,270
of 4,167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.